<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is this really still an issue?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bruinskeptics.org/2008/04/21/is-this-really-still-an-issue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bruinskeptics.org/2008/04/21/is-this-really-still-an-issue/</link>
	<description>Reason at UCLA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 02:26:53 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robin Zhang</title>
		<link>http://bruinskeptics.org/2008/04/21/is-this-really-still-an-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Zhang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 08:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bruinskeptics.org/?p=47#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t get me wrong, I&#039;m all for legalizing same sex marriage. But I think what&#039;s missing from the discussion is that very few states in the union will even allow civil unions - something that many on the right decry as a &quot;slippery slope to immorality and gay marriage&quot;. In fact, far more states have statutes banning civil unions than those that allow even a limited level of civil union. 

But maybe the Family Research Council is right. It could be more practical to pass civil unions in every state and hopefully the lack of a rapture or catastrophic natural disaster will help sway most Americans towards ultimately a pro-gay marriage position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I&#8217;m all for legalizing same sex marriage. But I think what&#8217;s missing from the discussion is that very few states in the union will even allow civil unions &#8211; something that many on the right decry as a &#8220;slippery slope to immorality and gay marriage&#8221;. In fact, far more states have statutes banning civil unions than those that allow even a limited level of civil union. </p>
<p>But maybe the Family Research Council is right. It could be more practical to pass civil unions in every state and hopefully the lack of a rapture or catastrophic natural disaster will help sway most Americans towards ultimately a pro-gay marriage position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim (yim)</title>
		<link>http://bruinskeptics.org/2008/04/21/is-this-really-still-an-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>jim (yim)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bruinskeptics.org/?p=47#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Bravo, bravo (I&#039;m not biased or anything).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bravo, bravo (I&#8217;m not biased or anything).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

